THE FIRST SEAL: THE CRACKED FOUNDATION

Revelation 6:1-2 (NASB):

“Then I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying as with a voice of thunder, ‘Come.’ And behold, a white horse, and he who sat on it had a bow; and a crown was given to him, and he went out conquering and to conquer.”
 
On August 7, 2013, as the First Seal broke open in my life, thunder rolled through the heavens like a warning long ignored. A white horse charged forth, its rider drawing a bow, a crown placed upon his head—going out conquering, and to conquer (Revelation 6:1-2). Many interpret this rider as Christ, pointing to the victorious King in Revelation 19. But look closer: that King wields a sword from His mouth, the sharp edge of truth. This rider's bow fires silently, its arrows unseen (Ephesians 6:16). His crown is bestowed by human hands, not won through sacrifice. Christ earned His through blood; this figure seizes power granted by others.
​
This is no divine victor—it's deception in disguise, the conquest of faith twisted into empire. The spread of Christianity was not a gentle dawn of light; it was carried on the wheels of Rome's chariot, forged in politics and blood. The Bible we hold today did not fall pure from heaven—it emerged from battlefields of power, where councils decided what to include, what to bury, and what to bend.

THE RIDER UNMASKED: CONQUEST CLOAKED IN HOLINESS
The bow's silence is telling—deception strikes from afar, undetected until it's too late. The crown, handed rather than earned, reveals the true nature: a usurper mimicking glory. History unmasks it plainly. Constantine's Edict of Milan in 313 CE opened the floodgates to imperial influence. The Council of Nicaea in 325 CE, convened under his watch, crafted creeds amid political maneuvering, condemning views like Arianism to enforce a facade of unity by eradicating differing viewpoints. By 380 CE, Theodosius I made Christianity the state religion, wielding the sword to silence dissent.
 
The Crusades from 1095 to 1291 turned faith into holy war, spilling innocent blood. The Inquisition followed, torturing for conformity. Even the Reformation, beginning with Luther's bold stand in 1517, led to divisions and executions—Calvin burning rivals in Geneva. What began as liberation became domination, faith co-opted for control.

Doesn’t this contradict the ways of God? Scripture reveals that all his ways and deeds are perfect, "just and upright is he" (Deuteronomy 32:4). It further reveals the ways of God and the devil as light versus darkness (John 8:12; 1 John 1:5)—to kill, steal, and destroy—is not the way of God (John 10:10). Scripture explains that the way of darkness operates by means of violence and force, with "the kingdom of heaven suffering violence, and violent men taking it by force" (Matthew 11:12). The rider's conquest exposes this truth: religion, meant to free, was reshaped into a violent tool for empire and control—precisely the wickedness Jesus lamented and ultimately suffered.

THE SHAM OF AUTHORITY: BATTLES OVER THE BOOK 
The Bible's formation was no serene process—it was a struggle for dominance. Early lists like the Muratorian Fragment (170–200 CE) omitted books; councils at Hippo (393 CE) and Carthage (397 CE) finalized the New Testament, differing from Jewish canons. Luther challenged seven books in 1534; Trent countered in 1546. Catholics count 73 books, Protestants 66, Orthodox more—each claiming their "true" collection.
​
Jude quotes Enoch (Jude 1:14-15), yet Enoch was excluded from the canon. The Dead Sea Scrolls revealed it alongside Jubilees—texts that shaped Jesus' world—but showed no trace of Esther. Why suppress some while later including others?
 
Enoch and Jubilees challenged hierarchies with stories of fallen watchers, divine councils, and cycles of refinement that undermined fear-based control. Esther, added centuries later, tells of court intrigue and vengeance, culminating in the slaughter of 75,000 enemies (Esther 9:16)—a narrative that glorifies nationalistic retribution within empire.
 
The post-exile reconstruction under Ezra (around 458 BCE) marks a pivotal moment. Scripture portrays him restoring the Torah after exile scattered texts and community (Ezra 7:10); apocryphal tradition describes him dictating anew after they were lost (2 Esdras 14). In that long gap of upheaval, texts were recopied and reorganized.
 
The result: a record that presents God as perfectly "just and upright," yet attributes to Him acts that echo the violence of empires—contradictions clashing with the revealed ways of light, life, and love.

Even in the books that made it into the canon, changes crept in. Deuteronomy 32:8, in older manuscripts (Dead Sea Scrolls and Septuagint), describes the Most High dividing nations "according to the number of the sons of God"—hinting at a divine council of heavenly beings. The standard Hebrew text alters it to "sons of Israel," centering everything on one nation.
 
The rider's conquest lingers here: human hands touched the sacred words, leaving fingerprints. Some voices were silenced, others elevated—truth transmitted through time, yet shaped by the struggles of those who carried it. The pattern is unmistakable: authority claimed divine, but wielded by men to consolidate power.
 
THE TREACHERY OF TRANSLATION: WORDS RESHAPED FOR CONTROL
Language shapes belief—and mistranslations distort meaning. Elohim, plural for divine beings, reduced to a singular "God." Olam or aionios, meaning "age-long," stretched into "eternal." The feminine ruach (spirit) masculinized to fit later doctrines. Ancient translations like the Septuagint introduced changes; Jerome's Vulgate added layers; King James carried royal bias. Modern versions twist terms like arsenokoitai to "homosexuals" to serve agendas.
 
What happens when words shift? Exodus 23:19’s “boil a kid in its mother’s milk”—an idiom about ingratitude, not dietary law—became rigid kosher rules. "Abomination," originally a purity violation, was weaponized as moral condemnation.
 
The intent shifts with each hand that touches it—words bent to uphold structures of exclusion and fear.
​
CONCLUSION: THE FIRST SEAL SHATTERS
The First Seal breaks open a profound revelation: religious authority stands on cracked ground, built through conquest, suppression, and manipulation. Empires disguised as faith crowned lies, buried voices that challenged control, and twisted words to divide.
 
On August 7, 2013, this seal shattered in my life, crumbling illusions I once held sacred. It was not loss, but awakening—a call to question, to unearth, to seek the unfiltered light.

Jesus overturned tables in the temple, exposing corruption at the heart. The Seal echoes that challenge: Will we cling to man-made foundations, or rebuild on truth? The rider's reign of deception ends here. As the Second Seal opens, hell's greatest myth awaits its fall.